Gemini 3.8 Flash
$13.20/ month
- Per 1,000 requests
- $3.75
- Self-hosting break-even
- 1,272,860 requests/month
Beyond this fleet's modeled capacity.
The economics of AI · GKE Standard
Compare GKE fleet costs, API pricing, and capacity for your workload.
USD planning estimates · Source snapshot 2026-09-05 · No GPU benchmark is implied.
Your scenario · Small team · 5–10 people
3,520 requests/month · 7.04M input tokens · 2.11M output tokens.
Self-hosting / month
$3,700.22 compute + $1,000 operations + $73 GKE fee, including idle time.
Fleet footprint
Qwen3.8 27B (xhigh) · 31.0 GB memory floor per replica · 1 node per replica.
Share of modeled capacity needed
Demand / usable output capacity of 170.82M tokens/month. Over 100% means this fleet is too small.
Start with an API on cost grounds
Gemini 3.8 Flash is $13.20/month for this token mix, versus $4,773.22 for your fleet. Self-hosting needs enough value from control, residency, customization, or avoided quality failures to cover the difference. Compare task success before choosing.
A2 Ultra · on-demand: Best used for models that fit on one node; inter-node serving needs separate validation.
Same request count and token mix, using your selected API mode. Compare quality separately.
$13.20/ month
Beyond this fleet's modeled capacity.
$35.20/ month
Beyond this fleet's modeled capacity.
$176.00/ month
Within modeled capacity; quality still unproved.
| Option | Standard input / output USD per 1M tokens | Your monthly bill | Per 1,000 requests | Self-hosting break-even |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Your GKE fleetA2 Ultra · on-demand | Fixed fleet cost | $4,773.22 | $1,356.03 | Reference fleet1.2% of usable capacity needed |
| Gemini 3.8 Flash | $0.75 / $3.75 | $13.20 | $3.75 | 1.27M requests/month Beyond this fleet's modeled capacity |
| Claude Sonnet 5 | $2.00 / $10.00 | $35.20 | $10.00 | 477.3k requests/month Beyond this fleet's modeled capacity |
| GPT-6 Astra | $10.00 / $50.00 | $176.00 | $50.00 | 95.5k requests/month Within modeled capacity; quality still unproved |
Standard uncached text rates. Immediate requests; no batch or cache discount assumed.
Verified 2026-09-05 · review by 2026-10-05
Standard uncached text rates. Immediate requests; no batch or cache discount assumed.
Verified 2026-09-05 · review by 2026-10-05
Standard uncached text rates. Immediate requests; no batch or cache discount assumed.
Verified 2026-09-05 · review by 2026-10-05
Explore the API cost curves against your fleet bill and capacity.
Drag or use the arrow keys, then apply the volume.
Try ½× or 2× demand and throughput with the same fleet. Select a scenario to apply it.
1.8k requests/mo · 50.0 tokens/s
API costs less
1.2% of capacity needed
Lowest API: $6.60/mo
Try this scenario →1.8k requests/mo · 100.0 tokens/s
API costs less
0.6% of capacity needed
Lowest API: $6.60/mo
Try this scenario →1.8k requests/mo · 200.0 tokens/s
API costs less
0.3% of capacity needed
Lowest API: $6.60/mo
Try this scenario →3.5k requests/mo · 50.0 tokens/s
API costs less
2.5% of capacity needed
Lowest API: $13.20/mo
Try this scenario →3.5k requests/mo · 100.0 tokens/s
API costs less
1.2% of capacity needed
Lowest API: $13.20/mo
Try this scenario →3.5k requests/mo · 200.0 tokens/s
API costs less
0.6% of capacity needed
Lowest API: $13.20/mo
Try this scenario →7.0k requests/mo · 50.0 tokens/s
API costs less
4.9% of capacity needed
Lowest API: $26.40/mo
Try this scenario →7.0k requests/mo · 100.0 tokens/s
API costs less
2.5% of capacity needed
Lowest API: $26.40/mo
Try this scenario →7.0k requests/mo · 200.0 tokens/s
API costs less
1.2% of capacity needed
Lowest API: $26.40/mo
Try this scenario →Each column shows lower, current, then higher throughput. These are stress scenarios, not confidence intervals.
Monthly capacity
A total-volume check. A month's spare capacity cannot absorb a burst that arrives in a few seconds.
Peak responsiveness
Record p95 first-token and completion times at your target concurrency using this configuration.
Use p95 measurements from the same configuration at peak concurrency. Zero means unmeasured.
Peak in-flight requests, not total team members.
An editable user-experience target, not a measured benchmark.
Choose a target suitable for the task and answer length.
Record the concurrency actually sustained during the pilot.
Use the full workload, including prompt processing and network delay.
Measure the whole response; aggregate tokens/s cannot predict this.
Memory and fleet cost for Qwen3.8 27B (xhigh), with the same fleet settings.
13.5 GBweights only, per replica
1 node · $4,773.22/month
¼ of 16-bit weight memory. Validate reasoning, tool use, and accuracy before accepting the quality trade-off.
27.0 GBweights only, per replica
1 node · $4,773.22/month
½ of 16-bit weight memory. A practical first compression test with a supported checkpoint and runtime.
54.0 GBweights only, per replica
1 node · $4,773.22/month
Full weight memory as a precision reference. Expanding quantized weights cannot recover lost quality.
Compression cuts the bill only when it reduces whole-node requirements or improves measured throughput. Check KV-cache memory and runtime and GPU format support.
Frontier comparison
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.2, ranked by evaluated variant. Costs reuse your fleet settings; speed and quantized quality require measurement.
| Rank and model | AA index | License | Memory | Fleet | Monthly | Decision |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 · Kimi K3 (max)Moonshot AI · 2800B parameters | 50.2 | Kimi K3 LicenseCommercial license | 3220 GB | 41 nodes / 41 GPUs | $152,782 | Review commercial terms |
| #2 · GLM-5.3 (max)Z AI · 753B parameters | 48.6 | GLM-5.3 LicenseCommercial license | 866 GB | 11 nodes / 11 GPUs | $41,775 | Review commercial terms |
| #3 · Qwen3.8 2.4T A95BAlibaba · 2400B parameters | 46.7 | Qwen3.8-Max LicenseCommercial license | 2760 GB | 35 nodes / 35 GPUs | $130,581 | Review commercial terms |
| #4 · GLM-5.3-FlashZ AI · 320B parameters | 46.2 | MITPermissive | 368 GB | 5 nodes / 5 GPUs | $19,574 | Validate multi-node serving |
| #5 · DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (max)DeepSeek · 1600B parameters | 42.1 | MITPermissive | 1840 GB | 23 nodes / 23 GPUs | $86,178 | Validate multi-node serving |
| #6 · Qwen3.8 27B (xhigh)Alibaba · 27B parameters | 41.6 | Apache 2.0Permissive | 31 GB | 1 node / 1 GPU | $4,773 | Pilot on this topology |
| #7 · K2 Horizon 375B A23BMBZUAI · 375B parameters | 37.8 | Apache 2.0Permissive | 431 GB | 6 nodes / 6 GPUs | $23,274 | Validate multi-node serving |
| #8 · MiniMax-M3MiniMax · 428B parameters | 35.7 | MiniMax Community LicenseCommercial license | 492 GB | 7 nodes / 7 GPUs | $26,975 | Review commercial terms |
| #9 · Inkling (xhigh)Thinking Machines · 975B parameters | 32.2 | Apache 2.0Permissive | 1121 GB | 15 nodes / 15 GPUs | $56,576 | Validate multi-node serving |
| #10 · Muse Glimmer (high)Meta · 30B parameters | 24.4 | Apache 2.0Permissive | 34 GB | 1 node / 1 GPU | $4,773 | Pilot on this topology |
Compare the same tasks and rubric. Starting values are illustrative; replace them with measurements. Calls include retries, and review covers all attempted tasks.
A separate task workload for this experiment. Required calls = tasks × each candidate's calls per task.
Use a loaded labor cost. Do not count hosting operations labor again here.
As AI agents transition from isolated developer experiments into production-scale workflows, engineering organizations are waking up to a…
CAG vs RAG for Generative AI: Compare latency, cost & complexity. Choose the best LLM context strategy for your app.
Snapshot checked 2026-09-05. Prices and rankings move; follow the linked authority before committing spend.